projects / evergreen / masslnc.git / commit
? search:
summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
(parent: eeed8ea) | patch
Nearest Hold: Look at 100 instead of 10 holds
authorThomas Berezansky <tsbere@mvlc.org>
Mon, 7 May 2012 18:13:17 +0000 (14:13 -0400)
committerMike Rylander <mrylander@gmail.com>
Thu, 10 May 2012 13:17:14 +0000 (09:17 -0400)
commitae9641cfae8f9b4535624599c3887c1232c3406e
treece418a901292462c7967cb0584034bc2fbc3b1f5tree
parenteeed8ea8d953152c88d47c0c69f35fbe4bb7f3e9commit | diff
Nearest Hold: Look at 100 instead of 10 holds

At the suggestion of Mike Rylander.

Because DB-wise the extra 90 IDs isn't a big deal, and this way we get more
chances to capture (or block renewal, etc).

Jeff Godin claims they have done this and it has produced no issues for them.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Berezansky <tsbere@mvlc.org>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rylander <mrylander@gmail.com>
Open-ILS/src/perlmods/lib/OpenILS/Application/Circ/Holds.pm diff | blob | history
Evergreen working repo (MassLNC)