From 7da13da7ebda6ac782c008b889e43d22dbf7faa7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Scott Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:41:09 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Reuse an existing 040 if possible The switcharound left us still appending the 040 to the new record, which had no fields, rather than amending the existing 040 on the incoming record. Signed-off-by: Dan Scott --- tools/ebooks/prep_ebook_records.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/ebooks/prep_ebook_records.py b/tools/ebooks/prep_ebook_records.py index d7ef422909..993a4c57c8 100644 --- a/tools/ebooks/prep_ebook_records.py +++ b/tools/ebooks/prep_ebook_records.py @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ def process_fields(record, options): new_record = pymarc.Record(to_unicode=True, force_utf8=True) - add_cat_source(new_record, options) # 040 + add_cat_source(record, options) # 040 add_restriction(record, options) # 506 # 590 -- 2.11.0